This description is a preliminary draft and is subject to change without notice
Linköping Diocesan Library, Kl f 10 (Olim No. VII; Scorialensis Eta. V. 3.)
ii, 202, ii' ff.
195 × 132 mm
The faded rubric has been filled in later, probably incorrectly, and the reference to Georgius Chrysococces’s Expositio in syntaxim Persarum in the margin is misleading. We thank Alberto Bardi for conveying this information to us; Bardi is at present working on a doctoral thesis and critical edition of the anonymous text.
For other manuscripts containing this text, see the article by Anne Tihon. Our manuscript, however, is not included in the list.
On f. 23r there is a description on how to convert Byzantine, Persian, and Arabic calendars; here we find the phrase ‘ὑποδείγματος οὖν χάριν ἐλάβομεν τὸ παρὸν ἔτος, ἤτοι τὸ ͵ϛϟιζ’, the present year being 1409, something which might be of interest as a terminus post quem for the text (or the copy).
One phrase is found in Georgios Gemisthos Plethon, De Astronomia: Μοῖραι μὲν ἐπὶ μοίρας πολλαπλασιαζόμεναι μοίρας ποιοῦσιν. Perhaps this is the short treatise by Plethon also preserved in Vindob. Phil. gr. 140, fol. 78–90 and Palat. gr. 278, fol. 135ff.
Cf. MS BL, Burney 92, fol. 226r (text no. 16). See also Theodorus Meliteniotes, De astronomia libri tres, Leurquin (1990–1993), vol. 2, pp. 8–598., ending similar to ch. 2, line 23. NB: only Books I–II are edited and available on TLG, so that it is possible that the extract in the ms comes from the third book.
On f. 120r a larger initial and the rubric ‘περὶ σεληνιακῶν ἐκλείψεις’.
On f. 120v a section on squared numbers: ‘Τῶν μετὰ ῥητῶν τετραγόνων ἀριθμῶν εὐχερής’, etc. Cf. Fabricius (1790–1809), vol. 11, p. 129.: De inventione quadraticorum laterum irrationabilium numerorum quadratorum.
Further tables containing geographical names and distances.
A digitization of Gustaf Wilhelm Gumaelius’s edition is available via and .
The red ink has all but disappeared; thus, the rubrics, subtitles, initials, and introductory lines of text in-between sections are not distinguishable. Cf. Denis Pétau’s printed text for the more complete text.
See also ms Bav. Vat. gr. 1059, fol. 205r–218v; 219r–223v (on Easter).
On f. 166v there is a table with various letters/numbers, which is not found in the printed text.
A comparison with Denis Pétau’s edition shows that its ending equals f. 178r line 18 (expl. ‘ἀξιόλογον ἀπεργαζομένης’). In our ms there are another seven lines of text, beginning with ‘ [--- chars ---]σοὶ δ’ αὐτῷ συνετῶς γε ὄντι καὶ κρίνειν’.
Cf. the text ‘Περὶ γεωργίας’ in Scorialensis Iota. R. 14, fol. 179, edited by Carlo Oreste Zuretti. In our ms there are another three lines of text, on the auspicious time for bloodletting etc.: ‘οὔσης ἐν Ταύρῳ, Λέοντι καὶ Τοξότῃ, δεῖ ποιεῖν τὰς τῶν αἱμάτων ἀφαιρέσεις· ἐν δὲ Ζυγῷ Σκορπίῳ Ὑδροχόῳ μεθ’ ὑποσταλῆς· ἐν δὲ Κριῷ Διδύμῳ Αἰγοκέρωτι Καρκίνῳ Ἰχθύσι Παρθένῳ οὐ δόλως ποιεῖν δεῖ’.
The greater part of the text equals Stefan Weinstock’s edition based on Oxoniensis Seldenianus 16 (=Seldenianus Supra 17), fol. 177v–179v, except for a lacuna in our ms from ‘οἱ δὲ Ἰχθύες ἐν ἁμφοτέροις τοῖς ἡμισφαιρίοις’ to ‘πάντα μὲν οὖν τὰ προδεδηλωμένα ἄστρα’. In the first few lines there is a reference to Aratus’s Phaenomena.
Astrological computations; text(s) not identified.
Lines 5–12 on f. 195v probably in another hand. A later addition perhaps.
Leaf dimensions:195 × 132 mm
Note:(presumed original size)
Watermark 1:ff. 5–79/166–188, Arc similar to Briquet, Arc 788, Arc 788Arc 796, Arc 796Arc 791Arc 791. Lichačev (1899), Arc 505Arc 505.
Watermark 3:ff. 90–95/108–109, Ciseaux similar to Briquet, Ciseaux 3666Ciseaux 3666. Harlfinger, Ciseaux 76Ciseaux 76. Lichačev (1899), Ciseaux 3798Ciseaux 3798.
Watermark 5:ff. 1–8/17–24, Tour similar to Briquet, Tour 15887Tour 15887. Lichačev (1899), Tour 3793Tour 3793.
Watermark 6:ff. 158/163–165, Huchet similar to Briquet, Huchet 7684Huchet 7684. Harlfinger, Huchet 10Huchet 10. Lichačev (1899), Huchet 2001Huchet 2001.
Watermark 7:ff. 199/200, Chapeau similar to Briquet, Chapeau 3413, Chapeau 3413Chapeau 3417Chapeau 3417. Harlfinger, Chapeau 75Chapeau 75.
Foliation mainly in ink in the upper right margin: 1a, 1b, 1–200 The blank leaves at the beginning and end of the textblock are foliated in pencil.
Note:Original composition not possible to reconstruct due to extensive restoration.
ff. 1r–80v, 181r–184v, 186r–188v A typical scholarly Renaissance hand writing in a minute module in light brown ink, now partly faded and hardly legible; astrological/nomical signs are employed frequently, as well as abbreviations; despite the compression, some letters are flourished in their ligatures and others a little enlarged and made more prominent, such as Taus and Etas. In the tables, the minute letters appear compressed in the sense of their height. ff. 29r–29v, 179r A less orderly and more wavy hand; the ink is darker, the module slightly bigger; it is probably also responsible for the correction at f. 1v. On f. 27v a scholion perhaps in a different hand. ff. 81r–107v, 126r–148v, 150r–157r, 196r–197v Set in a different framework for the tables, in a slightly darker ink, is also very small in module but slightly squatter in appearance; the Ksi is drawn in many curves; it is difficult to say if it is the same hand writing all these tables, but in any case the style is very homogeneous. ff. 111r–124r Still more minute and compressed, with a forward motion impressed to it by the slanting chis whose descending strokes echo the acute accents sprinkled above the line. The Gamma is often looped while the ligature Epsilon-Ksi is sometimes enlarged out of proportion (e.g. on f. 117r). The symbol for sun is used most frequently. This scribe occasionally displays the Epsilon ‘ad ombelico’. He uses simple initials enlarged in the margin; cf. the hand of Isidore Cardinal of Kiev, RGK, vol. 1, no. 155.. ff. 158r–162v, 166r–178v, 187v–188v Very similar to Hand A , though the writing of these tables is less precise, even somewhat sloppy. ff. 180v, 185r, 189r–194v, 195r–195v Perhaps different hands, one writing a very spidery small minuscule, but relaxing into more cursive an relaxed segments. Another writhing in a darker brown-grey ink. Unclear.
The rubrication of titles, subtitles, and initials has in most cases faded to all but total illegibility. This applies also for the outlines and details in many of the tables. There are traces of decorated initials e.g. at ff. 7v, 11v, 22r, 23r.
Restored and rebound in white parchment by the Swedish National Archives bookbindery in 1952.