Uppsala University Library, Gr. 6
Georgius Acropolites, Annales
Constantinople, 14th cent.
paper
i, 100, i' leaves
180 × 125 mm
Greek
According to Rudberg’s notes, the order of leaves should be the following: 1, lacuna (1 fol.), 4-7, 3, lacuna (1 fol.), 8-39, lacuna (8 ff.), 48-57, 40-44, 58, 59, 45-47, 87, 88, lacuna (1 fol.), 2, lacuna (12 ff.), 89-93, 60-65, lacuna (1 f.), 66-70, 94-100, 79-86, 71-78 (des. mut. 185, 16 ἐπέσπευδεν).
Lacunas are of the following passages ed. Heisenberg (see p. XI):
p. 4, l. 22 (οἶδε)-6,6 (ἀέκον[τί);
14,18 (ἐσταλμένος)-16,10 (Ἀντιοχείας);
72,19 (τὸ μέσον)-84,1 (μενόδοις);
118,14 (ἐκεῖθεν)-119,26 (προσκοπήσας);
121,11 (καὶ τὸ)-137,11 (ληϊσάμενοι);
148,23 (ἀφί[κοντο)-149,21 (ἀπι[στίαν).
Support
Foliation
Collation
Textblock
1-8 IV; 9-16 IV; 17-22 III; 23-32 V; 33-38 III; [8 ff. missing]; 39-46 IV? (part of thread visible between ff. 43 and 44 and also between 44 and 45; I can’t really explain why); 47-54 IV (47v: ριε); 55-59 III; 60-64 II; 65-70 III; 71-78 IV; 79-86 IV; 87-92 III; 93-100 IVCondition
Textblock
Fragile. The first leaf is attached and repaired at the edges with an older restoration of recycled paper, as are the next two, but is torn in the middle and in a very precarious state. Heavily trimmed and restored with paper in the outer and inner margins. There is a lose strip of restoration paper between f. 3 and f. 4 with writing on it. From f. 30 onwards, worming has eroded the inner corner at the top. The literature stresses that the traces of fire and water confirm the provenance of this ms from the Escorial catastrophe, the fire of 1671. Considerable brown staining is visible at ff. 1–4, ff. 40–59, the latter pages in a V-pattern extending from the top margins down the central opening of the book. In fact, most of the book is sound in this respect.Layout
Layout 1
Layout 2
Layout 3
Script
Textblock
Hand 1
(ff. 1r–50r, 51v–59v, 70v, 87r–88v, 94r–94v)Cranky script with fat open betas, smaller, more compressed to the line (but less so at (ff. 94r–94v)!), at times almost looking as if it was written by a shaky hand; Torallas Tovar suggests comparison with RGK II, 207: Joachim.Hand 2
(ff. 50v–51r)This scribe, noted as at (ff. 51v–52r), was included by Torallas Tovar in hand 3, but despite the similarity, I think it is a different hand.Additions
Binding
Soft parchment laced-case binding with four leather straps for fastening. Three main sewing stations visible on spine. Flyleaves contemporary with binding.
The edges are gilt.
Origin
Constantinople, typical 14th cent. handwriting. A note in the lower margin of f. 1r says: ‘βϊβλίον λεγόμ(εν)ον ἰσαάκϊος’. A note in black in on the lower margin of f. 5r reads: ‘στ ζια´ ἀπριλλίου ιβ´’ = 6711 : This indicates the date 12 April 1202. The same hand wrote another note at f. 30v, lower marg.
Provenance
Olim Escorial A. V. 12 (De Andrés, Catalogo no. 49). Once belonged to Theophilus Ventura. A note on the recto of the first unnumbered flyleaf, in brown ink: “‘Philos: Logothetae/Georgii Acropolitae Chronicon ab imp: Alexij Comneni usque ad imp: Michaelis Comneni absque fine Don Juan Gauriel e sparvenfeldt en Valladolid nel mes de abrile 1690’”. See also Catalogus centuriae librorum rarissimorum mss. etc. I. G. Sparvenfeldius, Upsala, 1706, p. 54 no. XLVII. The shelfmark “Sparv. 47” is also written in pencil on the front pastedown. A large number “3” is written to the left of the shelfmark. The note in ink on the pastedown is offset from the writing on the front flyleaf.
Acquisition
From Sparvenfeldt.
- Graux (1889), pp. 33–34.
- Rudberg (MS).